Both the Kaunda and Chiluba regimes
were associated with brutal policies of oppression. What is the reasonable
explanation can those who served under these governments, including Sata, to
prove they did not collaborate in all their evils?
By Nyalubinge
Ngwende
President
Sata worked in corrupt and repressive regimes. Zambia’s fourth republican
president was an errand boy both for Kaunda during UNIP and Chiluba under MMD. These
two regimes share 47 years of rule of infamy between them, 27 of UNIP and 20 of
MMD.
It
cannot be denied that Kaunda destroyed our democracy and was a ruthless tyrant,
whose regime tortured and jailed citizens for making intelligent argument
against awkward political rule and bad economic decisions. On the other hand, Chiluba
damaged the honesty and integrity of our society. Chiluba claimed he was a
democrat but he was only stopped by the full force of the opposition and civil
society from altering the two terms (five years each of presidency) and seeking
a third term.