A
non-entity discreet lab has stirred the country's that usually has people who
hardly mind to read the labels of the food packs they eat into believing the
country’s big meat company has been feeding them on a chemical used to embalm
dead bodies
By Nyalubinge Ngwende
Usually the aftermath of the
ruling Patriotic Front trouncing opposition political parties in by-elections
is dominated by debates how the government is wasting resources on parliamentary
by-elections it is inducing by offering positions in government to opposition MPs if they defected.
Yesterday the ruling party
scooped the Feira constituency by election with a landslide victory, with
former MMD MP retaining his parliamentary seat which he re-contested on the
patriotic Front.
But both the political
pundits from the ruling party and the opposition are not preoccupied what went
right or wrong over the poll, but the issue of meat allegedly containing a
poisonous chemical aromatic aldehydes, imported from Europe by the country’s
biggest company—ZAMBEEF—has dominated social media discussions and debate.
Hullaballoo about the
aldehydes chemical in ZAMBEEF meat follows a story by the national broadcaster
ZNBC main news report which quoted a Copperbelt based laboratory findings.
In the usual manner of
manufacturing consent reporting style aimed at raising public outrage, ZNBC
called aromatic aldehydes as a chemical used to embalm dead bodies.
And Zambian health minister
Joseph Kasonde said government was instituting its own tests on the meat and
warned of consequences if it is found true.
Following up debate on the
matter gives the insight about the aromatic adelhydes and their long use in the
processed food products.
A legal academician Elias
Munshya Wa Munshya in his comment posted on the Zambian People’s Parliament
FaceBook social page at 21.01 hours last night argues:
“We have been having these
aldehydes for years. This is the same chemical that gives ice-cream that
vanilla aroma. This is the same chemical that is used in most spices. This is
the same chemical that is used in processed foods to give them that fresh meaty
smell. I do not know why you are trying to create a storm where there is none.”
He adds: “We have been
munching on these for years. No one has ever died or even fallen sick. However,
I know several of our people in Butondo who today have respiratory problems
because of pollution from Mopani, and what has Hon Kasonde done about it?
Nothing. It is not public interest they are trying to protect, it is there own
personal selfish interests by stocking fear in Zambians over substances which
are by themselves not harmful. The PF government is a directionless government
which has no clue and will end up being embarrassed over this so called
manufactured scandal. More lies in our pockets”.
The issue of ZAMBEEF has not
escaped outcry of political machinations to fix the company by government as
way of trying to hurt one of its shareholders, opposition United Party for
National Development leader, Hakainde Hichilema.
Zambeef accuse |
If this issue about ZAMBEEF
is about settling political scores then we are really a very bad nation that is
not being truthful to ourselves.
If it is not, as it has been
heard so far that almost all farm products and processed foods are laced with aromatic
aldehydes, then what need to be established is what are the effects of this
chemical on the health of the people and what amounts are acceptable.
The reputation of the
Copperbelt laboratory, which is still discreet, must be scrutinised to ensure
its analysis is ethical given that it has made a big food safety scandal work
on ZAMBEEF.
ZAMBEEF is a company that has
abattoirs under regular public health inspection and whose imported meat
undergoes several checks as it crosses the oceans before finally hitting the
freezers in Zambian malls. We know this is a country where one has to struggle
to find meat that meets all the hygiene and health concerns, but ZAMBEEF is
quite responsible.
And if so, what has motivated
this lab to go after them, and what is the efficacy of its analysis and is this
its first work? These are difficult questions to answer.
But what is also surprising is
that on ZAMBEEF the government has taken a different path, expressing unusual
interest in the matter. It has failed to outright rebuff the findings as it did
with the University of Zambia nutritionist who said Soya beans products had
adverse health effects on human beings.
Honorable Haggai Amanda Phiri,
contributing to the debate on the virtual social media parliament asked: “Why
can't government close Zambeef?”
“I'm saddened with the swift
energy at which our Minister of health has responded on the ZAMBEEF saga...it
calls for concern as to why such pace is not seen on the lack of Oxygen at UTH,
malaria medicines and the ARVs in hospitals around the country. It therefore
goes without saying that most processed meat contains preservatives that are
NOT embalming but to preserve the product before it expires. How such has been
reduced to embalming is beyond me.”
The sure reason why people
think this is a politically motivated revelation without is how limited the
work of food safety testing has been.
They want to see such
investigations go beyond ZAMBEEF or else the conclusion of selecting the meat
company out of all others will be misconstrued, especially that one of the big
shareholders is an opposition political party leader for UPND.
But one member ZAPP, Cheleman
Nshitima reacted saying “Mr. Hon Zapp
Speaker, I’m sadden[d] by some comments doing the rounds in the house. One
thing is quite clear here, Zambeef is not a private company which the govt can
take over simply on these simple grounds. As a matter of fact/s, Zambeef is a
public company listed both on LUSE and the London stock exchange (LSE) meaning
that the company belongs to ordinary people. And some people, out of pure
hatred for PF govt are now blaming the gov[ernment] for being decisive and
protecting the public, may be because such people live abroad in Canada they
don’t feel for the ordinary on the ground. Here in the UK, we have had business
people who have been prosecuted for such acts and why not in Zambia?”
He further argues: “On the
other hand, hon. Edith Z Nawakwi has alleged corruption and that Zambeef is
being shielded by govt officials, so which is which? And oh, HH does not have
shares nor is he a major supplier for Zambeef people get your facts right and
according to Zambeef itself, HH is in fact their competitor so, where does this
nonsense of fixing HH coming from huh?
Logic is that if HH is a
competitor then he stands to gain from this whole saga, anyone competitor
stands to win if Zambeef is found wanting here.”
As seen so far, the appeal to
Zambians is to be level headed as they debate this delicate matter which is the
first food safety scam to enter the country’s public domain. At stake is not
just business, but the health of many people the mishandling of the issue might
cause to freak out over a storm in a cup of coffee.
NN
No comments:
Post a Comment